We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
今年CUMCM选B题的都是大牛~……
主要是我们觉得做第一题实在是没什么和别人不一样的地方。。
恩,这个的确
万分同意楼上……
貌似做第一题的人特别多…
的确,因为第一题思路好想,反正大家都想得到。第二题开放指数太高,风险也大。
其实本来我想做第二题的,因为我写过世博会对经济影响的专业论文,但是我的统计不牛X,估计定量分析做不到特别好,刚好队友是工科生,对A题比较了解,就选了A题。
论文亮点有是有,but貌似很悲剧出现了一个笔误,现在我们还怕被判模型错误来着,真是悲剧的浮云啊……
这个指数是怎么做的?
你们问的问题设什么样?谁回答(来自哪里,平均年龄等等)?
有多少个答案?
你们知道答应着看重什么来回答吗?
我们这个指数直接基于Google的搜索结果…
这个模型其实很sb的..
LZ竟然漏掉了蓝翔技校
不知这个网络舆情指数是怎么弄的,如果仅仅得到搜索引擎收录数目,那么很多善于做广告的学校应该很靠前才是。不过博主的思路很好,很赞~
呼吁详细流程~~